Insights

Our learning from implementing the community eco-credit model to date is set out in detail in the Greenfi White Paper. The following points summarise key insights that have emerged from ongoing implementation. These are our understandings that have guided the design and evolution of the model and which continue to shape its application in new contexts.

Credit is fundamental

Credit functions like a licensing system. It determines who will obtain the resources and working capital to plant, harvest, build and expand - and why. Credit rules shape the nature of economic activity: purely for profit or towards projects that grow environmental and social wealth alongside financial return. When we preferentially extend credit to activities that balance extraction with restoration, we make sustainable economic growth possible.

Historically, the financial system has steered resources to areas of the economy which have generated the greatest financial returns, underpinning modern prosperity. Now, credit agreements could be rebalanced to guide economic activity and resources toward endeavours that balance financial and environmental wealth creation, encouraging reinvestment in a community’s natural capital stock. Just as a company reinvests profits in its means of production, this model promotes reinvestment in the natural assets and ecosystems that sustain long-term prosperity.

Credit is catalytic

In community settings, credit functions not only as a financial mechanism but as a catalyst for collective decision-making and motivation around the management of natural resources. The financial incentive brings people to the table, but once the process begins, new social dynamics take over. As members discuss how to meet environmental terms, attention naturally shifts toward the value of natural resources and how they are managed. In this way, community-managed financial incentives act as a spark that enables communities to coordinate, deliberate, invest in the ecosystems on which their livelihoods depend, and overcome the complex and multifaceted barriers to sustainable production.

Credit is a social ritual

Credit is not only a financial instrument but a social act through which trust is extended, futures are imagined, and obligations are formalised. Financial institutions, whether formal or informal, house these rituals. And because credit shapes what the future looks like, its rituals matter. The way we grant or withhold credit determines whose visions of the future become real. The social rituals of eco-credit create a bond (quite literally), reaffirming trust not just between people but also emphasising and placing with high psychological priority, the ecosystems on which wealth depends.

The way community eco-credit projects are set up is therefore critical. The process of forming, governing and managing a community-level credit facility is itself the work. It defines the relationships of trust, accountability and shared value that make the system endure beyond the life of any external support.

Technology should enable but not undermine

Technology should enable the human act of credit creation, not replace it. Credit issuance should not be dehumanised or placed inside a black box where its workings become unintelligible. Where time and resources are constrained, the temptation is to use technology to reduce costs, but this risks undermining the very process by which the future is co-decided within communities. We built a digital recording system to give transparency to outside funders, but found that technology can easily erode the human foundations of credit creation: the conversations, judgments and shared commitments through which people actively create their own future. We recommend maintaining written ledgers that are digitally mirrored, but never replaced.

Local determination is utmost

In the community eco-credit model, groups self-determine how funds are managed and how credit and environmental terms are defined. This autonomy is central to both effectiveness and legitimacy. When local groups set their own priorities and conditions, the resulting credit system reflects local realities rather than external narratives and needs. This builds accountability from within, creating ownership over both the financial mechanism and the environmental outcomes it supports.

Small-scale producers are vital

Most small-scale producers who dominate land and seascapes in developing countries operate outside formal financial systems. They manage soil and other natural resources, supply food and materials, and bear significant environmental risk. They need financial instruments designed specifically for them and the circumstances in which they exist: mechanisms that reflect local realities, prioritise flexibility and optionality, and support rather than undermine the stewardship that sustains local ecosystems.

Trade-offs are real

In complex systems, problems are rarely solved outright; they are moved, transformed or managed. Community eco-credit groups may reduce local environmental damage, yet in doing so may also finance new forms of consumption that create environmental pressures elsewhere, often in ways that are difficult or impossible to quantify. This is an inherent tension in any environmental project that succeeds in creating local wealth, as they must be if they are to remain viable.

The eco-credit model recognises these trade-offs and places in local hands the means to determine which resources to protect and how. By making the negotiation of these choices explicit rather than hidden, the model accepts that sustainability is not a static end state but an ongoing process of managing competing needs within real economies and communities.

Continue to Tools